May 31, 2013

The US Military’s “Warrior Transition Battalion”: Drug ‘em up and shut ‘em up

(J. Driscoll- SHP) Well, it sounds good, anyway, all warm and fuzzy.  Words like “support” and “coping” and “choices” and “supportive care” are tossed around casually by the powers that be, almost like they mean it.  It’s the Warrior Transition Battalion, or “WTB” in military lingo, a program offered by the U.S. military to wounded warriors and their families, ostensibly to “provide personal support to wounded Soldiers who require at least six months of rehabilitative care and complex medical management. Support comes in the form of a triad of care with a primary care manager, a nurse case manager, and a squad leader — who coordinates care with other clinical and non-clinical professionals.”  Sure.

In short, the military pays lip service to being compassionate and nurturing (concepts the military is really not mentally wired to implement), while the soldiers flounder around with various injuries and disabilities, including traumatic brain injury (TBI) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), trying to meet the high expectations the military order still demands, while being flooded with lots and lots of drugs and very little in the way of actual medical treatment.  And punishment for having deficits; there’s as much of that as there are drugs.

Purple Heart recipient faces his newest battle “The Warrior Transition Battalion”

My son, Spc. Michael Maxfield, a Purple Heart veteran who joined the Army at 17, was on a tour in Afghanistan, on the recovery crew, until July 2012.  Toward the end of his tour, while on a convoy, the wrecker he was driving rolled over a roadside bomb.  His vehicle was blasted into the air, and he and his battle buddy of course went up with it – and crashed down with it.  His limbs, at least, were intact – but as for his brain, sloshing around in his head as his wrecker left the ground and plummeted back down, as for his back and spine and body, which went through contortions the human body isn’t designed for, as for his mind, his emotions. . . not so much.

So, he ended up at Ft. Bliss, Texas, in the WTB program, with TBI, PTSD, and back and spinal injuries, and began his tenure in this “supportive” and “caring” program.  Ten months later, this formerly healthy, high-functioning 25-year-old soldier is on ten different prescribed medications, for sleep, paranoia, anxiety, depression, back pain, high blood pressure and migraines.  He takes Zeprexa, an anti-psychotic, prescribed for paranoia; Klonopin, an anti-convulsant, sedative, muscle relaxer and hypnotic; Butalbital for migraines; Zomig, for migraines (which, ironically, has depression as a side effect); Trazodone, an anti-depressant for which suicidal thoughts is a side effect; Lunesta for sleep; Melatonin for sleep, which has side effects that include daytime sleepiness; Baclofen, a muscle relaxer, with side effects that cause impaired thinking; and Meloxicam, an anti-inflammatory for back pain.

He takes blood pressure meds, is on a CPAP sleep apnea machine, and – until recently – was on Percocet, otherwise known as Oxycodone, a heavy-duty narcotic, highly addictive.  He took the drug as prescribed, but, suddenly, the military docs at WTB decided he could be addicted, and attempted to transfer him to a substance abuse program.  He successfully fought that off, but not without a cost:  Retribution by higher-ups toward the soldiers within the WTB program isn’t an alien concept; and failure to toe the line is not considered good soldiering, even within this supposedly nurturing environment, even when the soldiers – many of whom, like my son, are in the process of being medically discharged, or who, like my son, are candidates for medical retirement – are functioning at a fraction of their pre-injury levels.

My son, a guy who rarely took as much as an aspirin before he was blown up is now – along with many of the other soldiers – drugged to the eyeballs.  He can’t sleep, or falls asleep in such a stupor he can’t get up for formation – and then is charged with being AWOL.  He’s on drugs that impair his thinking, on drugs that keep him up or cause drug-induced, non-restful sleep, on drugs for pain that cause depression, on drugs for depression that make him tired all day, on drugs that put him in a dreamlike state – the supportive program that WTB boasts of is little more than a steady diet of ever more drugs.  And then, within this same program – driven by the WTB Command, including squad leaders and platoon sergeants and 1st Sergeants – the soldiers are expected to function like regular soldiers, expected to get up at 5 a.m. for formation when the drugs have addled their minds and bodies, are expected to excel in areas they can’t possibly excel, particularly when plied with mind-altering drugs, drugs, and more drugs, are expected to meet every obligation like a fully-functioning soldier.  Formerly high-functioning, punctual soldiers struggle to make it to formation, to remember appointments, to get through every day without being called out by the “supportive” WTB command.

But on the Ft. Bliss WTB website, Sgt. Carlos Clark, a WTB squad leader, made it sound quite pretty, made the military sound like some kind of compassionate support group:  ”We’re the first line for the Soldiers . . . We handle everything with the Soldiers — educational needs, frustration with medical care, getting to appointments on time. And we’re very realistic with them. When something is beyond their control we help them to cope with the choices that have to be made.”

Really.

As we speak, my son is facing an Article 15 for missing two appointments his Nurse Case Manager failed to inform him of; WTB is threatening to remove him from the program because of the Article 15, which would cause him and his wife and two toddlers to be without military pay; and because of the injuries he sustained in the explosion, his former life, working in the trades, is over.

He and other soldiers are routinely accused of malingering.  His back and spinal injuries are being treated with drugs, because what he needs is surgery, but the WTB program doesn’t provide for surgical intervention, and he won’t be eligible for surgery until he’s medically discharged from the military.  As one ortho recently told me, his healing is complete, and it remains to be seen if surgical intervention is even possible at this point; the window of time for surgical treatment may have passed.  His neuropsychological evaluation revealed severe cognitive deficits, but specialized TBI treatment is in short supply; his memory is shot, he forgets the names of people he’s known his whole life, words elude him, he’s constantly fatigued and in a fog due to the cocktail of drugs on board, and the “supportive” and “nurturing” WTB program seeks to now punish him for what they created with their prescriptions and negligent medical treatment.  This is his story; but it’s the story of many soldiers who are imprisoned in the WTB program.

A few years ago, ProPublica and NPR did an extensive evaluation of the WTB program at Ft. Bliss.  The results were not positive.

“At Fort Bliss,” reported ProPublica and NPR, “we found that even soldiers who are diagnosed with such [brain] injuries often do not receive the treatment they need.  Most specialists say it is critical for patients who show lingering effects from head trauma to get intensive therapy as soon as possible. In the civilian world, such therapy is increasingly seen as the best way to minimize permanent damage, helping to retrain the mind to compensate for deficits.  Yet brain-injured soldiers at Fort Bliss have had to wait weeks and sometimes months just to get appointments with doctors, medical records show. Many have received far less therapy than is typical at well-regarded civilian clinics. In some instances, Fort Bliss medical officers have suggested that the soldiers are malingerers or that the main root of their cognitive problems is psychological.”  (Emphasis mine).  

Despite the glowing picture painted on Ft. Bliss’ WTB website, my son’s viewpoint seems to be bolstered by other soldiers’ experiences in the program.  The staff was found to be untrained or under-trained; treatment was minimal and often delayed; the soldiers were accused of malingering or of having psychological, not medical, issues.

Sgt. Brandon Sanford, 28, a dog handler who survived two roadside blasts in Iraq, “endured a year of balance problems and mental fog before Fort Bliss officials sent him for cognitive therapy.”  ”Here you have all these soldiers looking for help, and it was just getting swept under the carpet.”

Sgt. Raymond Hisey, 32, a convoy driver in the 1st Armored Division, “survived a roadside blast in Iraq in July 2009 . . . When he returned to Fort Bliss in October, he was diagnosed as having suffered a mild traumatic brain injury and was prescribed several courses of therapy. But a speech therapist cancelled several appointments, he said, and he clashed with the occupational therapist. Hisey was suddenly left without any treatment at all for his symptoms.”

Sgt. William Fraas, an 18-year military veteran and Bronze Star recipient, tried for nearly two years to get help for problems with his balance and vision. ”No one listens to the soldier(s) . . . They are there and they are crying for help.”

Blown up in Iraq, Sgt. Victor Medina’s treating physician attributed his ”multiple cognitive symptoms including poor concentration, short-term memory loss, and difficulty multi-tasking” to headaches and anxiety; he was accused of malingering.  ”I can understand being injured by insurgents,” he said.  ”But I can’t understand being injured by my own people.”

And then there’s Spc. Maxfield, my son, living with pain, in a fog, struggling to rebuild his life with his family, ensnared in a system that he’s finding it increasingly difficult to navigate.  I told him what the Ft. Bliss WTB website said about helping soldiers cope when they can’t meet expectations, and he laughed.  No, he said, not even close.

Said Lt. Col. Long Pham, Fort Bliss WTB commander, “This is first class. In the civilian sector they wouldn’t do this, but for our Soldiers, we do. Congress has mandated that we do the right thing for Soldiers, and we do.”

What they do is aggressively create monsters and then punish them for being monsters.  What they do is try to pigeonhole the soldiers and their conditions into “psycho” and “faker” slots so they don’t have to actually treat them.  What they do is create more anxiety for the wounded soldiers, and make no efforts to alleviate it.

Over 20 active duty soldier and veteran suicides a day should tell them something.  Until we act – by calling for Congressional inquiries, writing letters, engaging the media – our wounded warriors will be sent out into the world ill-prepared, injured and alone.

First stop, Congressional Inquiry.  Count me in.

This Article was edited and republished with permission of it’s author Julie Driscoll and originally appears on SmokingHotPolitics.com here.

March 24, 2013

Fox Lies again? Is anyone even surprised… but you gotta check this one out!

Remember when conservative comedian and Fox News contributor Steven Crowder was punched in the face by a union activist outside a Michigan protest? Crowder made a big deal about it, even going so far as to challenge the protester to a “legal, sanctioned mixed martial arts bout.” Then came the unsurprising revelation that the video was misleadingly edited to make Crowder look like an innocent, if obnoxious, victim.”*

Fox News contributor Steven Crowder played himself off as a victim beaten mercilessly by “union thugs” in Michigan a few months back. Then why didn’t he want charges pressed? After police intervened and saw the un-edited, raw tape they decided…Crowder has no case. What happened in the latest Fox Fail?

March 17, 2013

America’s Economy saved by….. Taco Bell? WTF? But sadly… It’s True!

Adding 15,000 jobs to the U.S. economy in 2012, Taco Bell is proud to announce that it had an incredible year, mostly due to the Doritos Locos taco. Taco Bell’s CEO proclaimed that it was the biggest launch in Taco Bell history.

March 3, 2013

Poll: Americans Agree with Democrats on Almost Every Issue

A new Pew Research poll shows that Americans mostly agree with Democrats on a majority of political issues, and meanwhile President Obama’s approval rating is climbing, while Republican approval is dropping.

December 28, 2012

The Never-ending Fiscal Cliff Negotiations for Dummies (Updated)

The Never-ending Fiscal Cliff negotiations

President Obama has cut his trip to Hawaii short to meet with congressional leaders in hopes of a last-minute effort to avoid the upcoming “fiscal cliff”.

The Fiscal Cliff Explained

“Fiscal cliff” is the popular shorthand term used to describe the conundrum that the U.S. government will face at the end of 2012, when the terms of the Budget Control Act of 2011 are scheduled to go into effect.

Among the laws set to change at midnight on December 31, 2012, are the end of last year’s temporary payroll tax cuts (resulting in a 2% tax increase for workers), the end of certain tax breaks for businesses, shifts in the alternative minimum tax that would take a larger bite, a rollback of the “Bush tax cuts” from 2001-2003, and the beginning of taxes related to President Obama’s health care law. At the same time, the spending cuts agreed upon as part of the debt ceiling deal of 2011 will begin to go into effect. According to Barron’s, over 1,000 government programs – including the defense budget and Medicare are in line for “deep, automatic cuts.”

In dealing with the fiscal cliff, U.S. lawmakers have a choice among three options, none of which are particularly attractive:

  • They can let the current policy scheduled for the beginning of 2013 – which features a number of tax increases and spending cuts that are expected to weigh heavily on growth and possibly drive the economy back into a recession – go into effect. The plus side: the deficit, as a percentage of GDP, would be cut in half.
  • They can cancel some or all of the scheduled tax increases and spending cuts, which would add to the deficit and increase the odds that the United States could face a crisis similar to that which is occurring in Europe. The flip side of this, of course, is that the United States’ debt will continue to grow.
  • They could take a middle course, opting for an approach that would address the budget issues to a limited extent, but that would have a more modest impact on growth.

Can a Compromise be Reached?

The oncoming fiscal cliff is a concern for investors since the highly partisan nature of the current political environment could make a compromise difficult to reach. This problem isn’t new, after all: lawmakers have had over a year to address this issue, but Congress – mired in political gridlock – has largely put off the search for a solution rather than seeking to solve the problem directly. In general, Republicans want to cut spending and avoid raising taxes, while Democrats are looking for a combination of spending cuts and tax increases. Although both parties want to avoid the fiscal cliff, compromise is seen as being difficult to achieve – particularly in an election year. Currently, it appears that a meaningful deal won’t be reached until after the December 31 deadline.

The most likely outcome is another set of stop-gap measures that would delay a more permanent policy change. Still, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that if Congress takes the middle ground – extending the Bush-era tax cuts but cancelling the automatic spending cuts – the result, in the short term, would be modest growth but no major economic hit.

Possible Effects of the Fiscal Cliff

If the current laws slated for 2013 went into effect permanently, the impact on the economy would be dramatic. While the combination of higher taxes and spending cuts would reduce the deficit by an estimated $560 billion, the CBO also estimates that the policy would reduce gross domestic product (GDP) by four percentage points in 2013, sending the economy into a recession (i.e., negative growth). At the same time, it predicts unemployment would rise by almost a full percentage point, with a loss of about two million jobs.

A Wall St. Journal article from May 16, 2012 estimates the following impact in dollar terms: “In all, according to an analysis by J.P. Morgan economist Michael Feroli, $280 billion would be pulled out of the economy by the sunsetting of the Bush tax cuts; $125 billion from the expiration of the Obama payroll-tax holiday; $40 billion from the expiration of emergency unemployment benefits; and $98 billion from Budget Control Act spending cuts. In all, the tax increases and spending cuts make up about 3.5% of GDP, with the Bush tax cuts making up about half of that, according to the J.P. Morgan report.” Amid an already-fragile recovery and elevated unemployment, the economy is not in a position to avoid this type of shock.

The Term “Cliff” is Misleading

It’s important to keep in mind that while the term “cliff” indicates an immediate disaster at the beginning of 2013, this isn’t a binary (two-outcome) event that will end in either a full solution or a total failure on December 31. There are two important reasons why this is the case:

1) If all of the laws went into effect as scheduled and stayed in effect, the result would undoubtedly be a return to recession. However, Congress continues to work toward a deal that will alleviate the effects in some form.

2) Even if the deal does not occur before December 31, as appears likely, Congress can – and almost certainly will – act to change the scheduled laws retroactively to January 1 after the deadline.

At the same time, even a “solution” isn’t necessarily positive, since a compromise will likely involve higher taxes or reduced spending in some form – both of which would help reduce the debt, but would be negative for economic growth.

With this as background, it’s important to keep in mind that the concept of “going over the cliff” is largely a media creation, since even a failure to reach a deal by December 31 doesn’t mean that a recession and financial market crash would necessarily occur.

(Source – About.com)

December 26, 2012

The MexiMorman War: Mitt Romney’s Family vs The Mexican Drug Cartels

I came across an interesting documentary about how the cartels of Juarez, Mexico, are at war with a group of Mormons, some of whom are related to Mitt Romney.  Although this may sound sensational and heroic, keep in mind, that violence, corruption and murder has not been committed by the Drug Cartels alone.  Vice films went there to document the conflict, meet Romney’s Mexican Mormon family, and find out more about how US policy is impacting the war on drugs.

August 21, 2012

Republican Skinny Dipping in Israel’s Sea of Galilee? Have They NO SHAME?

Kansas Republican Representative Kevin Yoder is in a firestorm because of water.  You see, this idiot and his wife went skinny-dipping on a recent trip to Israel.  Not that  that alone would be a big deal, but these dumb-asses went skinny dipping in the Holy Sea!  The Sea of Galilee to be exact, where the Bible says Jesus walked.  DUDE! WTF? Were YOU Thinking?  Oh That’s right, you weren’t!  lol  Oh Yeah, and now you say you were drunk when you did it? Like that makes it better? Wow…  Well folks watch these 2 videos for more information….enjoy

The Story

The Apology

July 15, 2012

Do The Arizona Cardinals Not Want Liberal Fans?

April 29, 2012

Obama gives and gets comic jibes at A-list gala

At the White House Correspondents’ Dinner attended by politicians, Hollywood stars and business executives, President Barack Obama lampooned his rival Mitt Romney and took a few punches, too, from the comedian host Jimmy Kimmel.

April 15, 2012

George Bush: ‘I wish they weren’t called the Bush tax cuts’

“Former President George W. Bush made a rare public appearance Tuesday morning, expressing regret that his name is attached to one of the largest tax cuts in U.S. history. According to Forbes, Bush spoke at his Institute Conference on Taxes and Economic Growth in New York City, claiming his continued support for lower taxes before delivering a surprising statement. “I wish they weren’t called the ‘Bush tax cuts,’” he said. “If they’re called some other body’s tax cuts, they’re probably less likely to be raised”…”.*  The Raw Story

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 27 other followers